级别: 初级博友
显示用户信息
UID: 199937
精华:
0
发帖: 5
流量: 2 M
威望: 15 分
介绍博友: 0 个
人民币: 0 元
好评度: 0 点
注册时间: 2018-03-28
最后登录: 2024-01-22
|
武汉大学 2015年博士学位研究生外语综合水平考试试题
武汉大学 2015年博士学位研究生外语综合水平考试试题 一、阅读理解 %h(%M'm? Justice in society must include both a fairtrial to the accused and the selection of an appropriate punishment for thoseproven guilty. Because justice is regarded as one form. of equality, we find in its earlier expressionsthe idea of a punishment equal to the crime. Recorded in the Old Testament isthe expression "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth." That is,the individual who has done wrong has committed an offence against society. Tomake up for his offence, society must get even. This can be done only by doingan equal injury to him. This conception of retributive justice is reflected inmany parts of the legal documents and procedures of modern times. It isillustrated when we demand the death penalty for a person who has committedmurder. This philosophy of punishment was supported by the German idealistHegel. He believed that society owed it to the criminal to give a punishmentequal to the crime he had committed. The criminal had by his own actions deniedhis true self and it is necessary to do something that will counteract thisdenial and restore the self that has been denied. To the murderer nothing lessthan giving up his own will pay his debt. The demand of the death penalty is aright the state owes the criminal and it should not deny him his due. ]gX8z#*k KaMg[G Modern jurists have tried to replace retributivejustice with the notion of corrective justice. The aim of the latter is not toabandon the concept of equality but to find a more adequate way to express it.It tries to preserve the idea of equal opportunity for each individual torealize the best that is in him. The criminal is regarded as being socially illand in need of treatment that will enable him to become a normal member ofsociety. Before a treatment can be administered, the cause of his antisocialbehavior. must be found. If the cause can be removed, provisions must be madeto have this done. Only those criminals who are incurable should be permanentlyseparated front the rest of the society. This does not mean that criminals willescape punishment or be quickly returned to take up careers of crime. It meansthat justice is to heal the individual, not simply to get even with him. Ifsevere punishments is the only adequate means for accompanying this, it shouldbe administered. However, the individual should be given every opportunity toassume a normal place in society. His conviction of crime must not deprive himof the opportunity to make his way in the society of which he is a part. Z79 6;qk ?f9M59(l 1. The best title for this selection is ( ) =}tomN(F~[ A. Fitting Punishment to the Crime RSj8T< B. Approaches to Just Punishment W%5
))R$ C. Improvement in Legal Justice a~@f,b
w D. Attaining Justice in the Courts q_^yma cQxUEY('+ 2.The passage implies that the basic difference between retributive justice and corrective justice is the ( ) . uX!6:v] A. type of crime that was proven OLt0Q.{ B. severity for the punishment Q}^Ip7T C. reason for the sentence CB-;Jqb D. outcome of the trial &ZMQ]'& 1P"{
T
Md? 3. The punishment that would be most inconsistent with the views of corrective justice would be( ). WI| -pzg A. forced brain surgery PX?%}~
v B. whipping W$wX[ C. solitary confinement E@otV6Wk[@ D. the electric chair @D*PO-s9 ~9APc{"A 4. The Biblical expression "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth” was presented in order to ( ). qT$ IV\;_ A. prove,that equality demands just punishment SJX9oVJeZ B. justify the need for punishment as a part of law Z5oDj|&l} C. give moral backing to retributive justice KwMt@1Z D. prove that man has long been interested in justice a+J> zJ(DO>,p& "In every known human society the male's needs for achievement can be recognized... In agreat number of human societies men's sureness of their sex role is tied up with their right, orability, to practice some activity that women are not allowed to practice. Their maleness in facthas to be underwritten by preventing women from entering some field or performing somefeat." )M"NMUuU" ]!!?gnPd5 This is the conclusion of the anthropologist Margaret Mead about the way in which the rolesof men and women in society should be distinguished.
T=~d.&J |S
).,B If talk and print are considered it would seem that the formal emancipation of women is far fromcomplete. There is a flow of publications about the continuing domestic bondage of womenand about the complicated system of defences which men have thrown up around theirhitherto accepted advantages, taking sometimes the obvious form of exclusion from types ofoccupation and sociable groupings, and sometimes the more subtle form of automatic doubtof the seriousness of women's pretensions to the level of intellect and resolution that men, itis supposed, bring to the business of running the world. 2V%z= V.$tq There are a good many objective pieces of evidence for the erosion of men's status. In thefirst place, there is the widespread postwar phenomenon of the woman Prime Minister, inIndia, Sri Lanka and Israel. Q\IViM ipMSMk7gx Secondly, there is the very large increase in the number of women who work, especiallymarried women and mothers of children. More diffusely there are the increasingly numerousconvergences between male and female behaviour: the approximation to identical styles indress and coiffure, the sharing of domestic tasks, and the admission of women to all sorts ofhitherto exclusively male leisure-time activities. S-\wX.`R1 GTfM *b Everyone carries round with him a fairly definite idea of the primitive or natural conditions ofhuman life. It is acquired more by the study of humorous cartoons than of archaeology, butthat does not matter since it is not significant as theory but only as an expression of inwardlyfelt expectations of people's sense of what is fundamentally proper in the differentiationbetween the roles of the two sexes. In this rudimentary natural society men go out to huntand fish and to fight off the tribe next door while women keep the fire going. Amorousinitiative is firmly reserved to the man, who sets about courtship with a club. *szs"mQ/ CeOA_M 5. The phrase "men's sureness of their sex role" in the first paragraph suggests that they( ) NL
` A. are confident in their ability to charm women. kq(><T B. take the initiative in courtship. Z@x& C. have a clear idea of what is considered "manly". n2-+.9cY D. tend to be more immoral than women are. 8;"%x|iBoL eLh35tw 6. The third paragraph () z8
S]FpM6 A. generally agrees with the first paragraph ?-Of\fNu B. has no connection with the first paragraph a]P%Y.?r C. repeats the argument of the second paragraph '^WR5P<8c D. contradicts the last paragraph &@{`{ C_ d|2C6 7. The usual idea of the cave man in the last paragraph() Jpp-3i.F# A. is based on the study of archaeology [cEGkz B. illustrates how people expect men to behave Rl0"9D87z C. is dismissed by the author as an irrelevant joke 0Qeda@J D. proves that the man, not woman, should be the wooer <W3p! !.V_?aYi8 8. The opening quotation from Margaret Mead sums up a relationship between man and woman which the author( ) =Oh$pZRymu A. approves of
Jn|<G B. argues is natural Zp_j\B C. completely rejects /o6id
o D. expects to go on changing am
.d^' x~Z7p)D_< Farmers in the developing world hate pricefluctuations. It makes it hard to plan ahead. But most of them have littlechoice: they sell at the price the market sets. Farmers in Europe, the U.S. andJapan are luckier: they receive massive government subsidies in the form ofguaranteed prices or direct handouts. Last month U.S. President Bush signed anew farm bill that gives American farmers $190 billion over the next 10 years,or $83 billion more than they had been scheduled to get, and pushes U.S.agricultural support close to crazy European levels. Bush said the step wasnecessary to "promote farmer independence and preserve the farm way oflife for generations". It is also designed to help the Republican Partywin control of the Senate in November's mid term elections. Fq+Cr?- yRyRH%p) Agricultural production in most poor countriesaccounts for up to 50% of GDP, compared to only 3% in rich countries. But mostfarmers in poor countries grow just enough for themselves and their families.Those who try exporting to the West find their goods whacked with huge tariffsor competing against cheaper subsidized goods. In 1999 the United NationsConference on Trade and Development concluded that for each dollar developingcountries receive in aid they lose up to $14 just because of trade barriersimposed on the export of their manufactured goods. It's not as if thedeveloping world wants any favours, says Gerald Ssendwula, Uganda's Minister ofFinance. "What we want is for the rich countries to let us compete." [D+PDR F:<+}{Av Agriculture is one of the few areas in which theThird World can compete. Land and labour are cheap, and as farming methodsdevelop, new technologies should improve output. This is no pie in the skyspeculation. The biggest success in Kenya's economy over the past decade hasbeen the boom in exports of cut flowers and vegetables to Europe. But that mayall change in 2008, when Kenya will be slightly too rich to qualify for the"least developed country" status that allows African producers toavoid paying stiff European import duties on selected agricultural products.With trade barriers in place, the horticulture industry in Kenya will shrivelas quickly as a discarded rose. And while agriculture exports remain the greathope for poor countries, reducing trade barriers in other sectors also works:Americas African Growth and Opportunity Act, which cuts duties on exports ofeverything from handicrafts to shoes, has proved a boon to Africa'smanufacturers. The lesson: the Third World can prosper if the rich world givesit a fair go. W2$rC5| h V`?,
~K This is what makes Bush's decision to increasefarm subsidies last month all the more depressing. Poor countries have longsuspected that the rich world urges trade liberalization only so it can wangleits way into new markets. Such suspicions caused the Seattle trade talks tobreak down three years ago. But last November members of the World TradeOrganization, meeting in Doha, Qatar, finally agreed to a new round of talksdesigned to open up global trade in agriculture and textiles. Rich countriesassured poor countries, that their concerns were finally being addressed.Bush's handout last month makes a lie of America's commitment to those talksand his personal devotion to free trade. s/~[/2[bnf k
n3GgdU 9.By comparison, farmers ( ) receive more government subsidies than others.? 6OC4?#96%' A.in the developing world / M]P&Zb | B.in Japan &"tQpw5 C.in Europe j&A9
&+w D.in America? gV ':Xe :Zq?V`+M 10.In addition to the economic considerations, there is a ( ) motive behind Bush’s signing of the new farm bill.? d9e~><bPJ A.partisan c??m9=OX1 B.social Fgwe`[ C.financial =r`E%P: D.cultural? &2@Rc?!6_P wp~KrUlR 11.The message the writer attempts to convey throughout the passage is that ( )? A~?)g!tS< A.poor countries should be given equal opportunities in trade? J$jLGy& ' B.“the least?developed country” status benefits agricultural countries? C.poor countries should remove their suspicions about trade liberalization? g;o5m
} D.farmers in poor countries should also receive the benefit of subsidies :N<o< |