Passage One (Clinton Is Right) ,-x!$VqS
President Clinton’s decision on Apr.8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on China’s entry into the World Trade Organization seemed to be a massive miscalculation. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. The Cabinet and Whit House still appeared divided, and business leaders were characterized as furious over the lost opportunity. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked “the courage” to reach an accord. And when Clinton later telephoned the angry Zhu to pledge a renewed effort at negotiations, the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop. y
_xnai
In fact, Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. A lot more horse trading is needed before a final agreement can be reached. And without the Administration’s goal of a “bullet-proof agreement” that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years. V G/3x R&y
THE HARD PART. Many business lobbyists, while disappointed that the deal was not closed, agree that better terms can still be had. And Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling, Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, and top trade negotiator Charlene Barshefsky all advised Clinton that while the Chinese had made a remarkable number of concessions, “we’re not there yet,” according to senior officials. K)T rZ 2
Negotiating with Zhu over the remaining issues may be the easy part. Although Clinton can signal U.S. approval for China’s entry into the WTO himself, he needs Congress to grant Beijing permanent most-favored-nation status as part of a broad trade accord. And the temptation for meddling on Capital Hill may prove over-whelming. Zhu had barely landed before Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss) declared himself skeptical that China deserved entry into the WTO. And Senators Jesse A. Helms (R-N.C.) and Emest F. Hollings (D-S. C.) promised to introduce a bill requiring congressional approval of any deal. # :T-hRu
The hidden message from these three textile-state Southerners: Get more protection for the U. S. clothing industry. Hoping to smooth the way, the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit. Zhu refused to open up much of the lucrative Chinese securities market and insisted on “cultural” restrictions on American movies and music. He also blocked efforts to allow U. S. auto makers to provide fleet financing. 0$7.g!h?
BIG JOB. Already, business lobbyists are blanketing Capitol Hill to presale any eventual agreement, but what they’ve heard so far isn’t encouraging. Republicans, including Lott, say that “the time just isn’t right” for the deal. Translation: We’re determined to make it look as if Clinton has capitulated to the Chinese and is ignoring human, religious, and labor rights violations; the theft of nuclear-weapons technology; and the sale of missile parts to America’s enemies. Beijing’s fierce critics within the Democratic Party, such as Senator Paul D. Wellstone of Minnesota and House Minority leader Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, won’t help, either. {3N'D2N
Just how tough the lobbying job on Capitol Hill will be become clear on Apr. 20, when Rubin lectured 19chief executives on the need to discipline their Republican allies. With business and the White House still trading charges over who is responsible for the defeat of fast-track trade negotiating legislation in 1997, working together won’t be easy. And Republicans—with a wink—say that they’ll eventually embrace China’s entry into the WTO as a favor to Corporate America. Though not long before they torture Clinton. But Zhu is out on a limb, and if Congress overdoes the criticism, he may be forced by domestic critics to renege. Business must make this much dear to both its GOP allies and the Whit House: This historic deal is too important to risk losing to any more partisan squabbling OL_{_K(w
iC
iZJ"
1. The main idea of this passage is Y>ji Xl?&
[A]. The Contradiction between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. 5*[2yKsTi
[B]. On China’s entry into WTO. O;7)Hjw t
[C]. Clinton was right. [AV4m
[D]. Business Lobbyists Control Capitol Hill. jA#/ Z
2. What does the sentence “Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, Detroit” convey? j~ j\\Y
[A]. Premier Zhu rejected their requirements. Kx_h 1{
[B]. The three places overdid criticism. wP,JjPUt
[C]. They wanted more protection. Mi~(aah
[D]. They are in trouble. qRbf
2;
3. What was the attitude of the Republican Party toward China’s entry into the WTO? iAa;6mH
[A]. Contradictory. [B].Appreciative. AkOO )0
[C]. Disapproving. [D]. Detestful. <AJ97MLcc
4. Who plays the leading part in the deal in America? HHqwq.zIy
[A]. White House . [B]. Republicans. ko5V9Drc
[C]. The Democratic Party. [D]. Businessmen. l }XU 5
9
5. It can be inferred from the passage that vM_:&j_?``
[A]. America will make concessions. xC
C:BO`pw
[B]. America will hold out for a better WTO {mB0rKVm
[C]. Clinton has the right to signal U. S. approval for China’s entry. qC'{ ;ko
[D]. Democratic party approve China’s entry into the WTO. " vtCTl~t
86
W0rS[5
Vocabulary %v2R.?F8
1. drubbing 痛打 cyJG8f
get/take a drabbing 遭人痛打 Ytgj|@jsp
2. flip-flop=great change suddenly 游说，突然改变，突然反方向。人字拖鞋，趾拖鞋 l3 DYg
3. hold out 维持，保持 svXR<7) #
hold out for sth. 故意拖延达成协议以谋求…… }jill+ ]
4. horse –trading 精明的讨价还价 %c[ V
5. bullet-proof 防弹的 8b0d]*q
6. lobby 收买，暗中活动 Pb*5eXk
7. lobbyist 院外活动集团成员 ^U]UqX`
8. partisan 党人，帮派，是党派强硬支持者 t|m=J`a{q;
9. acrimony 语言/态度的刻薄 |r bWYl.b
10. sell to 说服（某人）接受或采用 ;N RF=d >
11. meddle 干预 d:yqj:
12. Capitol Hill 美国国会 *}8t{ F@k
13. budge 使稍微移动，改变 p uT'y
14. lucrative 有利可图的，赚钱的 MTUn3;c/
15. block 制止 &5: t n=E
16. fleet 舰队，船队，车队，机队 Uk\Id ~xLV
17. blanket 覆盖，妨碍扫兴，扑灭 B 2ec@]uD`
18. Capitulate 投降，停止抵抗 MeUaTJFEB
19. fast track 快速行程（轻车熟路） xC tm
Xo
20. with a wink 眼睛一眨，很快的 A2|U d_
21. out on a limb 孤立无援（尤指争论和意见上） _/O25% l
22. renege 违约 + E1h#cc)
23. squabble 争吵 +o9":dl
@'GGm#<
难句译注 \m1~jMz*>k
1. President Clinton’s decision on Apr.8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement… }3?n~s\)6f
[结构分析] send one packing 打发人走。 "Y \_
TtY
[参考译文] 克林顿于4月8日决定不达成中国加入世贸组织的协议便打发中国总理朱容基走人。 7NJhRz`_
2. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. O |w J)
[结构简析] in the bag 倒手，囊中之物。 ;amXY@RmH
[参考译文] 总统遭到许多报界舆论的抨击，它们曾报道过这桩买卖（入世贸）已是囊中之物。 &iV,W4
3. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked “the courage” to reach an accord. t]-5 ]oI
[参考译文] 朱指责克林顿缺乏达成协议的勇气。 ^yOZArc'r
4. the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop \eFR(gO+
[参考译文] 普遍认为总统的姿态来了一个一百八十度的转弯。 #t+d iR
5. Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. 8]LD]h)B"
[参考译文] 总统故意拖延协议以谋取一笔更好的入世贸组织交易的决定完全正确。 l'eyq}&
6. And without the Administration’s goal of a “bullet-proof agreement” that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years. 8-O)Xx}cU
[参考译文] 没有商界院外活动集团成员热情的劝说共和党国会采纳政府目标中的防弹性（保护性）协议，那么整个过程将会以党派之间的尖刻的争吵而结束，这会影响以后多年和中国的关系。 k1 !@^A
7. the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles. o>VVsH
[参考译文] 美国政府希望（为纺织业）铺平道路，试图使朱在纺织品上让步，结果失败。 ZMq6/G*fD
8. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit. ukUGvK
[结构简析] 这句句子连接上文而说。 vuYSVI2=H
Leave sb. In the lurch 固定用法，义：置某人于困难之中弃之不顾，遗弃某人。完整句型应该是：Wall Street, Hollywood and Detrait are also left in the lurch. {E8~ Z8t
T
[参考译文] 同样也陷于困境的有华尔街，好莱坞和底特律。 \P6$mh\T
9. Zhu refused to open up much of the lucrative Chinese securities market and insisted on “cultural” restrictions on American movies and music. He also blocked efforts to allow U. S. auto makers to provide fleet financing. ?F3
h)(}
[参考译文] 朱容基总理不允许开放金融股票市场，坚持对美国电影和音乐作文化方面的限制规定，不让美国汽车商染指投资汽车。 q *9!,!e
10. Translation. 翻译。这是作者为共和党的“The time isn’t right”做注解/解释。
&U db9
,l)^Ft`5
写作方法与文章大意 .;N 1N^
文章以先声夺人的写作手法：克林顿不同意中国加入世贸打发朱总理回国引出两党（共和党和民主党）矛盾，国会和白宫之相反意见（对比写法）到最终四方趋向一致来证明总统决定是对的——以最好的价码使美国获得最佳利益为前提同意中国加入世贸来满足美国商人的要求。 _FWBUZ;N
[)TRTxFb
答案祥解 q?8|
[.
1. C. 总统是对的。这篇文章摘自Business Weekly. 文章是从商人的角度来看待中国加入WTO，他们希望从谈判中获得更多的利益，而克林顿的同意不同意的目的和他们相符——争取更多利益。这篇就是从四方利益最终趋向一致“同意中国加入世贸”来证明“总统结论正确”的中心思想。 0i
k7v<:
第一段指出Clinton由打发朱总理回国，不同意中国入世到一百八十度大转弯，在电话中愤怒的朱总理表示再次努力协商。内阁和白宫官员意见分歧，商人对失去机会火冒三丈。 |/)${*a4n
第二段点出克林顿故意拖延以谋取更多的利益的决定是正确的——文章的主旨句。商人院外活动集团成员要以“政府完美无缺的协议的目标来说服共和党赞成/接受。以免整个过程以党争而告终。 s ']Bx=
第三，四段是商业方面的高级官员的代表纷纷却说Clinton“当中国作出许多优惠让步时，美国不在那里。”（意：美国吃亏了现在不要再吃亏了。）克林顿有权签署赞成中国加入世贸组织，可他需要国会批准北京永久性最惠国作为扩大贸易协定的组成部分。再说对国会的干预的诱惑力相当大：就在朱踏上美国本土时，参议院多数派领袖Trent Lott宣布他对中国是该不该入世持怀疑态度，而参议院Tesse A Helms… 承诺提出一项要求国会批准任何交易的提案。 %B.yW`,X
第五段讲了朱总理的强硬立场。第六段又是共和党的反对声，使民主党内站在北京以便的批评家也无能为力。 K9up:.{QQ
最后一段指出：尽管困难重重，这一历史事件太重要了，不能因党争而冒失失去机会的危险。 @ n
Cd
A. 民主党和共和党的矛盾。两党之争见上文译注，最终还是一致。 B. 论中国加入世贸组织。文章不是论中国加入而是论美国环绕中国入世贸的种种。 D. 商人院外活动集团成员控制国会。这在第五段中提到商人院外活动集团成员阻挠美国国会事先接受最终协议，但不是主题思想。 :w^Ed%>y7
2. A. 朱总理拒绝了他们的要求。见难句译注9。 *vwbgJG! *
B. 这三个地方批评过头。 C. 他们要求更多的保护。 D. 他们陷入困境。 &e X!#nQ_.
3. A. 矛盾。共和党一开始就反对。什么对中国该不该加入世贸组织持怀疑态度。第六段说得更露骨，时间不对。意思是他们想把整个事件看起来好象克林顿屈从于中国，忽视了“中国违反人权，宗教权，劳动权，偷窃核武器技术，把导弹组成部件买给美国的敌人”等事实。最后一段共和党一下子又所他们最终将会接受中国加入世贸组织以表示对整体美国的好感。不管是商人院外活动集团的作用，还是明确指出重开谈判的重要性。这一历史事件太重要绝不能因党争而失去机会。共和党纵然心中不愿，也不得不接受现实。心情是矛盾的。 \r+8qC[,
B. 赞赏。 C. 不赞成。 D. 厌恶。 V 6,H}k
4. D. 商界。第一段中就点出：商界领袖对失去这次机会火冒三丈。第二段中提到商界院外活动成员要以实实在在的协议来说服共和党国会，免得以党争告终。第三段明确指出：许多商界院外人士一方面对协议未签定表示失望，另方面又同意，还会更好的条件。各种和商界直接关系的高级官员对克林顿劝说。 OL^l 3 F
第五段：纺织，金融股票，汽车以至电影等都是商界的要求。朱总理拒绝的就是商界要求。 @W"KVPd
第六段提及商界院外活动的成员制止国会事先接受最终协定。 yb KWOp:O
最后一段又是商界使共和党联盟和白宫懂得此事的重要性。 W~7A+=&
5. A. 美国将会作出让步，见上面注释。商人是绝对不会放弃中国市场的。 oc >{?.^
B. 美国会故意拖延以求取得更好的条件。这一点恐怕不会，见上文注释。朱总理的强硬立场，商人的见解。 C. 克林顿有签署批准中国入世之权。 D. 民主党赞成中国加入世贸，这两项都是事实。 )`O~f_pIC
8p:e##%
Passage Two (Europe’s Gypsies, Are They a Nation?) v : OR
The striving of countries in Central Europe to enter the European Union may offer an unprecedented chance to the continent’s Gypsies (or Roman) to be recognized as a nation, albeit one without a defined territory. And if they were to achieve that they might even seek some kind of formal place—at least a total population outnumbers that of many of the Union’s present and future countries. Some experts put the figure at 4m-plus; some proponents of Gypsy rights go as high as 15m. {C N~S*m
Unlike Jews, Gypsies have had no known ancestral land to hark back to. Though their language is related to Hindi, their territorial origins are misty. Romanian peasants held them to be born on the moon. Other Europeans (wrongly) thought them migrant Egyptians, hence the derivative Gypsy. Most probably they were itinerant metal workers and entertainers who drifted west from India in the 7th century. I!Z_ [M
However, since communism in Central Europe collapsed a decade ago, the notion of Romanestan as a landless nation founded on Gypsy culture has gained ground. The International Romany Union, which says it stands for 10m Gypsies in more than 30 countries, is fostering the idea of “self-rallying”. It is trying to promote a standard and written form of the language; it waves a Gypsy flag (green with a wheel) when it lobbies in such places as the United Bations; and in July it held a congress in Prague, The Czech capital. Where President Vaclav Havel said that Gypsies in his own country and elsewhere should have a better deal. waj0"u^#
At the congress a Slovak-born lawyer, Emil Scuka, was elected president of the International Tomany Union. Later this month a group of elected Gypsy politicians, including members of parliament, mayors and local councilors from all over Europe (OSCE), to discuss how to persuade more Gypsies to get involved in politics. 2KYw}j
|5
The International Romany Union is probably the most representative of the outfits that speak for Gypsies, but that is not saying a lot. Of the several hundred delegates who gathered at its congress, few were democratically elected; oddly, none came from Hungary, whose Gypsies are perhaps the world’s best organized, with some 450 Gypsy bodies advising local councils there. The union did, however, announce its ambition to set up a parliament, but how it would actually be elected was left undecided. %_%Q 8,W
So far, the European Commission is wary of encouraging Gypsies to present themselves as a nation. The might, it is feared, open a Pandora’s box already containing Basques, Corsicans and other awkward peoples. Besides, acknowledging Gypsies as a nation might backfire, just when several countries, particularly Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, are beginning to treat them better, in order to qualify for EU membership. “The EU’s whole premise is to overcome differences, not to highlight them,” says a nervous Eurocrat. 2Tp1 n8FV
But the idea that the Gypsies should win some kind of special recognition as Europe’s largest continent wide minority, and one with a terrible history of persecution, is catching on . Gypsies have suffered many pogroms over the centuries. In Romania, the country that still has the largest number of them (more than 1m), in the 19th century they were actually enslaved. Hitler tried to wipe them out, along with the Jews. _)>_{Pm
“Gypsies deserve some space within European structures,” says Jan Marinus Wiersma, a Dutchman in the European Parliament who suggests that one of the current commissioners should be responsible for Gypsy affairs. Some prominent Gypsies say they should be more directly represented, perhaps with a quota in the European Parliament. That, they argue, might give them a boost. There are moves afoot to help them to get money for, among other things, a Gypsy university. +{f:cea (1
One big snag is that Europe’s Gypsies are, in fact, extremely heterogeneous. They belong to many different, and often antagonistic, clans and tribes, with no common language or religion, Their self-proclaimed leaders have often proved quarrelsome and corrupt. Still, says, Dimitrina Petrova, head of the European Roma Rights Center in Budapest, Gypsies’ shared experience of suffering entitles them to talk of one nation; their potential unity, she says, stems from “being regarded as sub-human by most majorities in Europe.” Ni-xx9)=
And they have begun to be a bit more pragmatic. In Slovakia and Bulgaria, for instance, Gypsy political parties are trying to form electoral blocks that could win seats in parliament. In Macedonia, a Gypsy party already has some—and even runs a municipality. Nicholas Gheorge, an expert on Gypsy affairs at the OSCE, reckons that, spread over Central Europe, there are now about 20 Gypsy MPS and mayors, 400-odd local councilors, and a growing number of businessmen and intellectuals. [`"ZjkR_J
That is far from saying that they have the people or the cash to forge a nation. But, with the Gypsy question on the EU’s agenda in Central Europe, they are making ground. zv\kPfGDK
ij( B,Y
1. The Best Title of this passage is m!tbkZHQn0
[A]. Gypsies Want to Form a Nation. [B]. Are They a Nation. 8"8t-E#?
[C]. EU Is Afraid of Their Growth. [C]. They Are a Tribe eoG$. M"
2. Where are the most probable Gypsy territory origins? )I^7 )x
[A]. Most probably they drifted west from India in the 7th century. .yqM7U_
[B]. They are scattered everywhere in the world. -~v2BN/
[C]. Probably, they stemmed from Central Europe. pm
9"4 z
[D]. They probably came from the International Romany Union. 9CWF{"
3. What does the International Romany lobby for? CR"|^{G
[A]. It lobbies for a demand to be accepted by such international organizations as EU and UN. $!-c-0ub
[B]. It lobbies for a post in any international Romany Union. 4gz
H8sF
[C]. It lobbies for the right as a nation. ( u\._Gwsx
[D]. It lobbies for a place in such international organizations as the EU or UN. 0z
lb0[
4. Why is the Europe Commission wary of encouraging Gypsies to present themselves as a nation? F@'Jbd`
[A]. It may open a Pandora’s Box. q G?Qc (
[B]. Encouragement may lead to some unexpected results. >,$_| C
[C]. It fears that the Basgnes, Corsicans and other nations seeking separation may raise the same demand. *
K D I}B>
[D]. Gyspsies’ demand may highlight the difference in the EU. ~=6xyc /c
5. The big problem lies in the fact that e.7 E U
[A]. Gypsies belong to different and antagonistic clans and tribes without a common language or religion. M/>7pZW
[B]. Their leaders prove corrupt. +./H6!
[C]. Their potential unity stems from “being regarded as sub-human”. 1PQ~jfGi
[D]. They are a bit more pragmatic. K1"*.\?F
bMg(B-uF7
Vocabulary !;Yg/'vD-
1. albeit 尽管，虽然 cl[ BF'.H
2. outnumber 数字上超过 Y)0*b5?1r
3. ethnic 少数民族的成员，种族集团的成员 AS'R?aX|C
4. Hindi 印地语 CrC^1K
5. misty 模糊不清的，朦胧的 I7 |Pi[e
6. derivative 衍生的，派生的 ZkRx1S"m
7. itinerant 逻辑的 \o}xF@sM5
8. Romanesten 说吉普塞语的地方 %p
^wZtm
Romanes 吉普塞语 M -cTR d-i
Stan 地方 v5!d$Vctu
9. outfit （口）组织，（协同工作）的集体 $+8cc\fq
10. local 地方（市，镇，县）政务委员会 =9y[1t
11. wary 谨慎的，机警的 p4. wh|n
12. backfire 产生出乎意料或事与愿违的结果 2,$ 8icM
13. highlight 强调 "bFTk/
14. persecution 迫害 we~[ ]
\
15. catch on 了解，风行=to become popular 0%9 q8 M;
16. pogrom 大屠杀，集体迫害 j"ThEx0
17. commissioner 委员，调查团团员 Bn=by{i
18. quota 定量，配额，限额 m XRB7k
19. snag （尖利突出物，抽丝）潜在的困难 ZXqSH${Tp
20. heterogeneous 由不同种类组成的 ]
bM)t<
21. antagonistic 有效对抗性的，对抗性的 KyVQh8
22. clan 氏族 g`{;(/M+
23. tribe 部落 kw >v:F<M
24. pragmatic 务实的，讲究实效的 Tzt8h\Q ^z
25. municipality 城市，镇，区属政府，自治区 c(3~0Yr
26. Rom 罗姆，即吉普塞人 3EV;LH L
CY
4gSe?
难句译注 w j*,U~syB
1. Central Europe 中欧，如本文提及捷克，匈牙利，罗马尼亚等。 prC;L*~8
2. European Union 欧盟。 Ye"o6_U "
3. the EUs institutions 欧洲机构，如：European Commission 欧盟委员会，European Council 欧盟理事会，European Parliament 欧洲会议，the Court of Justic 欧洲法院。4m=more than 4 million 四百多万。 oI0M%/aM
4. Unlike Jews, Gypsies have had no known ancestral land to hark back to. s` M9
[结构简析] hark back to =to mention again or remember an earlier subject, event, etc. 吉普塞不知其祖先来自何方，而犹太人在《圣经》中已阐明了他们的历史。 @oNH@a
j%
[参考译文] 吉普塞人和犹太人不同，他们没有可以回想起来的已知的祖居地。 ;X8y Fq
5. …the notion of Romanestan as a landless nation founded on Gypsy culture has gained ground. bx#>BK!
[结构简析] gain ground (on) 接近。 o1-m1 <ft
[参考译文] 作为建立在吉普塞文化基础上的无疆地民族应该有一个说吉普塞语的地方。这种想法越来越为人接受。 #ZJ _T`l
6. the International Romany Union 国际吉普塞人联盟。 RHaI ~jb
7. Vaclav Harel (1936--) 剧作家和人权运动成员，1990——1992为捷克斯洛伐克的总统，1993年后为捷克总统。 ;\a
YlV-
8. a Slovak-born lawyer 斯洛伐克出生的律师，1992年捷克斯洛伐克 TC @s
9. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe 简称OSCE，偶中安全合作条约组织，成立于1972。 >QjAoDVX ?
10. nation 一词有民族和国家的含义。这里主要指：民族。因为作为国家应有疆土，但吉普塞人有要求成立国家的想法，欧盟是国家加入地方，不是民族加入。 )<oJn xe]
11. electoral block 选举集团 =!kk|_0%E
12. The might, it is feared, open a Pandora’s box already containing Basques, Corsicans and other awkward peoples. jlkmLc pf
[结构简析] Pandora’s box 潘多拉盒子——喻种种麻烦事。潘多拉是主神宙斯命火神用黏土制成的第一个女性。宙斯命潘多拉带着一个盒子下凡。潘多拉私自打开盒子，于是里面的疾病，罪恶等各种祸害全部出来，散布于世。这里潘多拉盒子喻里面已有的各种麻烦的民族，吉普塞加入，更多了一份麻烦。 0C = 3dnp6
[参考译文] 人们担心，若让吉普塞人作为一个民族代表，就会打开了一个潘多拉盒子，里面已经装有要独立的西班牙的巴斯克人，意大利的科西嘉人和其他难以对付的民族。 J} htu
x*![fK
写作手法与文章大意 i 'a?kSy
文章以对比手法环绕吉普塞是不是一个民族/国家，可不可以取得合法地位这一中心而写。从人口上说，它的数量超过加入欧盟许多国家，应在欧盟中一席之底。但人口分散在各国，他是对抗的部落，还没有共同的语言和信仰。不像犹太人，它们没有回归的祖居地。它们成立了国际联盟，也选出了领导，在布鲁塞尔开设了办事处，想成立国会，但不知如何落实操作，只是极力游说欧盟和联合国等组织，以获得一个合法地位和发言权。这是欧盟日程表上一个问题，但欧盟等机构又担心，万一他们取得正式地位，那些国家中正闹分离和独立的民族也会提出同样的要求，就象潘多拉盒子那样，不能打开。 xAqb\|$^
K0H'4' I
答案祥解 I3=%h
1. B. 他们是一个民族/国家吗？整篇文章环境这一点而写，文章一开始就提出中欧入欧盟的国家会给大陆吉普塞人一个机会，承认他们是一个民族——国家，虽然没有界定的领土（作为国家，应有领土）。吉普塞人的领袖人物也指出其人数超过欧盟中许多现在有的和将来要入盟的国家。他们至少要在欧盟中有一席之地。第二段提出，吉普塞和犹太人不同，他们没有可回归的祖居地。他们的语言属印欧语系。英国人认为他们来自埃及及移民。最可能的是七世纪时一些流浪的手工业工人和艺人从印度向西方流移。第三段涉及一种思想——以吉普塞文化为基础的无疆土的吉普塞民族应有个说话的地方—越来越为人接受。国际吉普塞人联盟声称代表30多个国家的吉普塞人，做了几件事：展开自我联合，提出语言标准和书面形式，在联合国进行游说活动时挥动吉普塞国旗，在布鲁塞尔设立办事处，六月在捷克首都布拉格召开会议。第四段集中讲到会上选出了联盟主席。一群选出吉普塞的政治家——国会议员，市长，地方政务委员再次在布拉格开会，会议由欧洲安全合作条约组织召集，来讨论如何动员更多的吉普塞人参政。第五段涉及联盟雄心勃勃的宣布要建立国会，但如何实际操作还未落实。后面主要是外界对吉普塞的态度。第六段描述欧盟委员会在吉普塞作为最大的大陆少数民族，历史上遭到残酷的迫害，应赢得特别承认。19世纪他们横遭奴役，希特勒企图把它们和犹太人一起消灭。第八段讲了欧洲会议中有人提出吉普塞在欧洲机构中应有一席之地，还提议一个常务委员负责吉普塞事务。还有行动筹建建立一所吉普塞大学。后面两段讲的是困难，第九段点出。最后一段指出，现在说他们有人有钱可以组成（国家）为时还早，可是吉普塞是欧盟中日程表上的一个问题，他们日益接近解决。从内部，外部情况分析都说明吉普塞是一个组成国家的民族。全文都是环绕它是不是，该不该承认为民族/国家而写，所以B项他们是不是民族是最佳标题。 kY&k-K\
A. 吉普塞要想组成一个国家（民族）。这只是文章涉及到的部分内容，中欧国家想加入欧盟一事可能产生的结果。 C. 欧盟害怕它们成长。 D. 他们是一个部落。 sR(9IW-
2. A. 最可能是在7世纪从印度流浪到西方。见第1题第二注释。 {%<OD8>p
B. 他们分散在世界各地。 C. 可能他们源于中欧。 D. 他们可能来自国际吉普塞人联盟。 Uo -)pFN^
3. D. 它们在这些国际组织，如欧盟，联合国中进行活动游说要取得一席之地。见第1题第一段，三段注释。 ql<i] Y
A. 它们游说活动欧盟和联合国接受他们的要求。太抽象。 B. 它们活动游说在国际机构取得职位。 C. 他们游说作为民族的权利。 t0/p]=+.p/
4. C. 它害怕巴斯克人，科西嘉人和其它要求分裂的民族会提出同样的要求。见难句译注11。
>7wOoK|1'
A. 它可能会打开潘多拉盒子。此盒子在文章中只是比喻。 B. 鼓励可能会导致某些意想不到的结果。 D. 吉普塞的要求会加深欧盟分歧。 B,D两项不够明确。 ~o82u w?
5. A. 吉普塞人属于不同的，而且常常是对抗的民族的部落，还没有共同的语言和宗教信仰。 @E^~$-J5j
B. 他们领袖很腐败。 C. 他们潜在的团结来自被人看作是低于人类（次等人）。 D. 他们有点太讲究实效， B,C, D 三项不是主要问题。主要问题是A. 项。 z8jk[5z
文字
