一.名词解释 qF4pTQf
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. 'U4@Sax,
注册资本 o%?~9rf]]
二.论述题 wfBf&Z0{
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 3AarRQWsn
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 AO^c=^
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 ;O * o
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 Dq~D4 |
三.案例题(中文回答) "p kn
INTRODUCTION 1
$rrfg
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must ~b SjZ1`
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles ? Eh)JJt
of international trade law to support your argument J l9w/T
;PG,0R`Z;
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American aT%6d@g
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD .eM
A*C~n
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese BJ 7m3[lz
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market gIaPS0Q
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed ,daZ K
xT
back an acceptance. {w|KWGk2
tD !$!\`O
Questions: vd!|k5t[d
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per 9<S};I;
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? 8
t
Ef>
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese m;"dLU b
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? \3 v}:E+3
?.b.mkJ
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B \LZ VazXD
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity h2]gA_T`
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between EkE U}2
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked p-;I"uKv
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter 8rA?X*|S!
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. gzD NMM
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on rq>Om MQ67
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the KQ(7% W
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was SH${ \BKup
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a 4Sxt<7[f
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of />\6_kT
China and international practice X0QLT:J b
$9Y k]~
Questions:
d;9F2,k$w
1)What is the main issue in this case? R7xEE7p
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve #X J`/\E]
the dispute?
