2008中科院英语翻译全文 b{fQ|QD{^E
`/Nm
2K
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher [2ax>Yk$
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has [-&L8Un
violated the ethical standards of the research F}"] 92
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but 0O k,oW{
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable bYz&P`o}
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, d:G]1k;z
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own .^$YfTabq
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, #,{+3Y&5-+
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists lTU$0CG
and their institutions, result in the imposition of @aQ1khEd
counterproductive regulations, and shake public 0A{/B/r
confidence in the integrity of science. nC {K$
^-FRTC
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is nW"q
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is %gnM(pxl
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person fw oQ'&
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past y2O4I'/5<
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of kY]W
Qu
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be j@Qg0F
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can iJnU%
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the MxzLK%am
charge, the institutions involved, and science in Av0y?oGH
general. 7u\*_mrv
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research KRJLxNr
ethics usually has more options than are immediately GRy-+#,b"
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to pj?XLiM54%
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. Y2o6kS{x
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, E{HY!L[
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of B=
keBO](@
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a e6=]m#O9
complaint. +.RKi!
tweY'x.{
An important consideration is deciding when to put a A?G IBjs
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are Z%Z9oJ:
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal kF7(f|*
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint w@2Vts
in writing can have serious consequences for the career C1T_9}L-A
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after HaA1z}?n
thorough consideration. "QoQ4r<|
The National Science Foundation and Public Health K!D
o8|
Service require all research institutions that receive :hG
PTf
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with *9ywXm&?
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take {F&-7u0
into account fairness for the accused, protection for ,_!6U
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and }U@m*dEG
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. 1Xy]D
:5GZ \Z8F
In addition, many universities and other research PR<||"03
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics EoX_KG{
officer, or other official who is available to discuss DaNW~rd{
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions ]IJRnVp%
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever A5#y?Aq
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry M8w5Ob
points, so that complainants can go to a person with 2EQ
6J
whom they feel comfortable. 3`9{T>
/E wGW
0f ER*.F
1、广义地说,即使是一个不轨行为,也能中伤科学家和他们的单位,导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行,并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 4X
NxI1w)
2、如果处理不当,一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 4^c-D
3、在大多数情况下,最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里,指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师,在决定是否提出投诉时,能提供宝贵的意见 fbZibcQ%k
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果,只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 x}fn'iUnm
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。