2008中科院英语翻译全文 ,St#/tu
r_T\%
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher HDYr?t~V
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has "aK3
ylz;
violated the ethical standards of the research n'0^l?V
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but Wm4@+}
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable y5iLFR3z
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, r#*kx# "
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own JPS22i)P
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, *}Zd QJL
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists Y$!K<c k
and their institutions, result in the imposition of ;!&A
counterproductive regulations, and shake public y.2_5&e/
confidence in the integrity of science. vb)Z&V6(
8AT;9wZqt
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is :j9{n ,F
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is 5b3Wt7
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person _Xd,aLoo
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past 6+BR5Nr
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of P0S;aE
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be 7kO5hlKeo
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can LGKkT?fcSC
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the /E$"\md
charge, the institutions involved, and science in ?JDZDPVJ)
general. 7(^<Z5@
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research g<{/mxv/
ethics usually has more options than are immediately 7$WO@yOsh
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to F=yrqRS=
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. ym:^Y-^iV
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, DtG><g}[]
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of .,(bDXl?
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a ]h~=lItTRZ
complaint. bVSa}&*kM
JYOyz+wNd
An important consideration is deciding when to put a !L:!X88
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are #qT 97NQ
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal d$8rzd
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint `YAqR?Xj_<
in writing can have serious consequences for the career EMzJJe{Cv
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after T5.1q
r L
thorough consideration. 3]WIN_h
The National Science Foundation and Public Health k-xh-&
Service require all research institutions that receive \NKf$"x}
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with DhV($&*M
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take CdlE"Ye
into account fairness for the accused, protection for ;X-~C.7k
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and ?Q[uIQ?dV
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. ^'!]|^
zvYkWaa_Qz
In addition, many universities and other research )a.Y$![
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics =:n>yZ3T
officer, or other official who is available to discuss f1(V~{N,+
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions &1YqPk
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever 3Ba>a(E
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry T^g2N`w2
points, so that complainants can go to a person with ZQ9!k*
^
whom they feel comfortable. JO\Tf."a \
_fha9`
Gf\Dc
1、广义地说,即使是一个不轨行为,也能中伤科学家和他们的单位,导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行,并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 0'*whhH
2、如果处理不当,一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 EGL1[7It`
3、在大多数情况下,最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里,指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师,在决定是否提出投诉时,能提供宝贵的意见 zOD5a=[1
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果,只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 #XR<}OYcL
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。