2008中科院英语翻译全文

2008中科院英语翻译全文 +O8%Hm  
q ?|,O;?  
One of the most difficult situations that a researcher mk;&yh  
can encounter is to see or suspect that a colleague has &v56#lG  
violated the ethical standards of the research Bal$+S  
community. It is easy to find excuses to do nothing, but /5S30 |K  
someone who has witnessed misconduct has an unmistakable `g(Y*uCp  
obligation to act. At the most immediate level, \nXtH}9ZF  
misconduct can seriously obstruct or damage one's own joFm]3$;  
research or the research of colleagues. More broadly, ^]H5h]U'  
even a single case of misconduct can malign scientists U>YAdrx2a  
and their institutions, result in the imposition of &-;4.op  
counterproductive regulations, and shake public ,vr? 2k  
confidence in the integrity of science. caIL&G,  
=O&%c%~q  
To be sure, raising a concern about unethical conduct is *1uKr9  
rarely an easy thing to do. In some cases, anonymity is @P#N2:jwj  
possible-but not always. Reprisals by the accused person =i$Fl{vH  
and by skeptical colleagues have occurred in the past &q3"g*q  
and have had serious consequences. Any allegation of M||+qd W!  
misconduct is a very important charge that needs to be SON-Z
"v  
taken seriously. If mishandled, an allegation can rA3$3GLQ-  
gravely damage the person charged, the one who makes the %P<hW+P!  
charge, the institutions involved, and science in b+%f+zz*h  
general. J*r*X.  
Someone who is confronting a problem involving research .I7pA5V{#  
ethics usually has more options than are immediately {o)Lc6T8s  
apparent. In most cases the best thing to do is to IshKH-  
discuss the situation with a trusted friend or advisor. Ok|* !
!T  
In universities, faculty advisors, department chairs, ojafy}  
and other senior faculty can be invaluable sources of AS !?q  
advice in deciding whether to go forward with a s(5Y  
complaint. oL!EYbFD'Z  
z
kt+7,vI  
An important consideration is deciding when to put a $ZUdT  
complaint in writing. Once in writing, universities are PxTwPl  
obligated to deal with a complaint in a more formal /'Ass(=6  
manner than if it is made verbally. Putting a complaint wu7Lk3  
in writing can have serious consequences for the career VEH&&@d  
of a scientist and should be undertaken only after 3r<~Q7e  
thorough consideration. ~d o9;8v  
The National Science Foundation and Public Health Y#]+Tm(+  
Service require all research institutions that receive &SIq2>QA  
public funds to have procedures in place to deal with 3]OE}[R  
allegations of unethical practice. These procedures take H7?Vybg~  
into account fairness for the accused, protection for Rvkedb  
the accuser, coordination with funding agencies, and Nu0C;B66  
requirements for confidentiality and disclosure. N"pc,Q\xU  
7P%%p3  
In addition, many universities and other research >] qc-{>&  
institutions have designated an ombudsman, ethics 5<iV2H
x  
officer, or other official who is available to discuss }Q)#[#e  
situations involving research ethics. Such discussions aFc1|.Nm  
are carried out in strictest confidence whenever u9:`4b  
possible. Some institutions provide for multiple entry $Ad {Z  
points, so that complainants can go to a person with Z_PNI#h*
 
whom they feel comfortable. Ot$-!Y;<  
_ ?TN;  
)}''L{k-  
1、广义地说，即使是一个不轨行为，也能中伤科学家和他们的单位，导致不利于科研出成果的法规的实行，并动摇公众对科学诚实性的信心。 W$QcDp]#p}  
2、如果处理不当，一个举报能严重伤害被控告者、指控者、有关单位、乃至整个科学。 AG3>V+k{Lv  
3、在大多数情况下，最好的方法是与一个值得信任的朋友或导师讨论此事。在大学里，指导老师、系主任和其他高级教师，在决定是否提出投诉时，能提供宝贵的意见 LZ\q37UV  
4、书面投诉对科学家的职业生涯会产生严重后果，只有完全考虑清楚后才能进行。 ylUrLQ\  
5、这些措施涉及公平对待被告、保护投诉人、与基金管理机构协调、并根据要求保密及公开。

这么快就上网了，超牛！ `+`Z7  
对比一下，能得个8-9分吧，这部分当时就晕了，词汇不过关啊！

学习中

有没有其他部分的答案啊？

感谢搂主，我还没有考试，可以借鉴一下中科院的经验文字

十分感谢楼主

dsf vfgtdfh