一.名词解释 \S"is z
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. )\1@V+!E%
注册资本 )Oq|amvC
二.论述题
)\1QJ$-M&
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 u0}vWkn\4
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 ^4y,W]JUDt
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 ] vz%iv_
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 ZFi ee|,q
三.案例题(中文回答) 6`&a&%,O
INTRODUCTION ;"xfOzQ
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must ~ G)S
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles ;d@#XIS&-(
of international trade law to support your argument U2ohHJ``
T"(&b~m2b4
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American Fh)IgzF j
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD +UC G0D
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese xI{)6t$`
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market UZWioxsKr+
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed L,HhbTRca
back an acceptance. \J4L:.`qS
2\)xpOj
Questions: $1SPy|y
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per g K+ 4
C
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? # nc
R b
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese "0$a) 4]
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? a`wc\T^
, |
0}<%
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B
_Mi5g_
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity 0!D4pvlt
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between :v YYfs&
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked {WJ m
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter n"$jG:A QJ
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. ov|d^)'
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on x! hh"x
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the I.I `6(Cb
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was
mR!1DQ.\<
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a )tG\vk=@
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of []D&bYpv
China and international practice Qo>b*Ku;
$5 >e
Questions: } j <)L,
1)What is the main issue in this case? %Celc#v
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve \TIT:1
the dispute?
