一.名词解释 > n~l\
fC
非歧视原则.CFR.单证严格相符原则.特别提款权.单独海损.关税减让原则.原产地规则. o@ ?3i+%}8
注册资本 ?UXK
y
二.论述题 iY
=M67V
1.试述国际经济法的调整对象与法律特征 58H [sM4>
2.简述国际经济法的主要法律渊源,并请举例说明之 ?fog
34g
3.如何理解国际货物买卖中的权利担保原则 rf+'U9
4.试述投资保护协定的法律含义与主要内容 cxTP4\T\E
三.案例题(中文回答) Y",Fs(
INTRODUCTION {iP^51fy
Answer in Chinses the following questions after you read the cases.You must `laaT5G\y
answer them prexisely to the point,Put forward the various basic principles +\FTR
of international trade law to support your argument w][1C\8m
S
~\i"A)4
Case1 On Julu 10,a Chinese company sent an offer by telex to an American h[D"O6 y
company:selling 300 tons coffee beans,each metric ton at the price of USD ]Dm'J%P0}
1,900CIF New York,firm offer standing for 2 weeks.On July 22,the Chinese %]JSDb=C
company leaned that the price of coffee beans on the international market aU]A#g
has raised by 30%.Just only on the morning lf July 22,the US company telexed 0]l _qxv
back an acceptance. .+<Ul]e/
;d1\2H
Questions: >9{Gdq[gyr
1)Can the Chinese company raise the price of coffee beans from USD 1,900 per ;z;O}<8s
ton to USD 2,500 per ton? +'abAST
t
2)Dose the offer have legal binding force towards the offer (the Chinese /TTmMx*
company)?In this case,can the offerer withdraw his offer? |3f?1:"Z
&B
uO-
Case 2 On November 10,1990,A(a Chinese forergn trade company,the seller and B VLW<"7I 6\
(an American company,the buyer)reached an agreement in terms of price,quantity `7qZ6Z3z@
,quality,payment and shipment of certain product by exchange of fax between .P\wE";
them.Tow days later,A,as usual,mailed aletter of comfirmation to B and asked * B!uYP
B to return the letter having it signed,B found that the price in this letter c&.>SR')
was somewhat different from that had been during the process of communication. '~RP+
So B refused to sign the letter of comfirmation and asked A to deliver the on (tV/.x*G
.So B refused to sign the letter of confirmation and asked A to deliver the w,dDA2,
goods according to the terms as previously settled by fax.A held that it was {-IH?!&v
under no obligation to supply the goods since they haven't entered into a bX%9'O [-
formal contract in accordance with the Law of Foreign Economic Contract of J[rpMQ
China and international practice E(Tvj\9
tgy*!B6a~
Questions: gT$`a
1)What is the main issue in this case? (K"U# Zn
2)If A brought the case before a Chinese people's court and if you were the judge in handling the case ,how would you choose the applicable law to resolve ]NS{q85
the dispute?