南京师范大学考博英语模拟题及其解析 Ao\xse{E
Bernard Bailyn has recently reinterpreted the early history of the UEU/505
United States by applying new social research findings on the c$O8Rhx
experiences of European migrants. In his reinterpretation, migration 9}(w*>_L
becomes the organizing principle for rewriting the history of e$# *t
preindustrial North America. His approach rests on four separate hF%M!otcJ-
propositions. O
G`8::S
The first of these asserts that residents of early modern England 8xAV[i
moved regularly about their countryside; migrating to the New World :DD<0
was simply a “natural spillover”. Although at first the colonies Wg']a/m
held little positive attraction for the English — they would rather CMa6':~
have stayed home — by the eighteenth century people increasingly
@Z jT_
migrated to America because they regarded it as the land of Geng duo I//=C6
yuan xiao wan zheng kao bo ying yu zhen ti ji qi jie xi qing lian xi B5b:znW2@
quan guo mian fei zi xun dian hua: si ling ling liu liu ba liu jiu 0MG>77
qi ba ,huo jia zi xun qq: qi qi er liu qi ba wu san qi opportunity. J:xGEa t
Secondly, Bailyn holds that, contrary to the notion that used to Lc3&\q
e
flourish in America history textbooks, there was never a typical New C]`uC^6g
World community. For example, the economic and demographic character @
~3--
of early New England towns varied considerably. ,eXtY}E
Bailyn’s third proposition suggest two general patterns wPA^nZ^}9c
prevailing among the many thousands of migrants: one group came as uqMw-f/
indentured servants, another came to acquire land. Surprisingly, i5,iJe0cA
Bailyn suggests that those who recruited indentured servants were the 18X@0e
driving forces of transatlantic migration. These colonial ?,} u6tH
entrepreneurs helped determine the social character of people who Q;h.}N8W
came to preindustrial North America. At first, thousands of unskilled ^D yw(>9
laborers were recruited; by the 1730’s, however, American employers A1WUK=P
demanded skilled artisans. SN{z)q
Finally, Bailyn argues that the colonies were a half-civilized Z>[7#;;
hinterland of the European culture system. He is undoubtedly correct JF~i.+{h
to insist that the colonies were part of an Anglo-American empire. PwY/VGT
But to divide the empire into English core and colonial periphery, ,:_c-d#
as Bailyn does, devalues the achievements of colonial culture. It is &q